The idea
A Premiership team of the year, as voted for by football bloggers up and down the country.
How it will work
Each blogger wishing to take part names their own personal Premiership team of the year, puts it on their blog and mails me to let me know, linking the blog. Then the amount of votes each player receives is added up, giving an overall bloggers team of the year. This team would then be put on all blogs for everyone to see, with info on who voted for who.
If you’re interested in taking part, either leave a comment below, contact me on Twitter (@Pricep87) or through email (pricep87@gmail.com) It’s only going to be worth doing if we get enough bloggers to take part, so let’s get an idea on numbers…
19 May 2011
18 May 2011
Managerial Up's And Down's
Date: Wednesday 21 May 2008
Location: Luzhniki Stadium Moscow
Time: 23:35 (local time)
Event: UEFA Champions League Final
What’s at stake: An illusive Champions League title and, evidently, Grant’s job
Situation: Possibly Avram Grant’s most important half time team talk to date
Having already lost in the League Cup Final, the pressure was on Avram Grant to deliver some sort of silverware to the Chelsea hierarchy. This was his last chance, the final game of the season, the one trophy that Russian owner Roman Abramovic wanted most, the Champions League. Grant had the chance to turn himself from zero to hero in the space of a single match.
It’s coming up to half time, you’re team have been outplayed for most of the first half, 1-0 down, barely still in the game thanks to some outstanding saves from your Czech goalkeeper. You’re planning your inspirational team talk, what can you say to the team to lift them for the second half? Then, Frank Lampard equalises, suddenly everything’s changed. You’re back on level terms before the break, what to say now?
Whatever he said worked, to a degree at least. Chelsea were resurgent in the second period, pinning Man Utd back and taking the game to them. The only thing they couldn’t do was score. Extra time came and went. The lottery of a penalty shootout. Chelsea lost, and Grant was sent packing.
Fast forward three years…
Date: Sunday 15 May 2011
Location: DW Stadium Wigan
Time: 16:50
Event: Wigan V West Ham 6 pointer at the bottom of the Premiership
What’s at stake: Survival/relegation and possibly Avram Grant’s job
Situation: Another half time team talk. Maybe not as important as the Champions League Final, but try telling that to Hammers fans
Sitting bottom of the Premier League, Avram Grant’s West Ham are 6 points from safety, 3 points away from their opponents on the day Wigan. Win, and they see another week of Premiership action. Draw or Lose, and they are relegated from the Premiership.
A great first half from Grant’s side, as a brace from Demba Ba see’s them take a 2-0 lead into the break. 45 minutes of football left to play, and all West Ham need to do is stay in the lead. Grant again takes his players into the dressing room for the all important team talk. Keep going? Sit back and absorb pressure, maybe make a defensive substitution to shore up at the back?
His words didn’t have the same effect as they did back in 2008. 12 minutes into the second half Charles N’Zogbia had got one back for Wigan, who were level just over 10 minutes later. With West Ham struggling under pressure, the killer blow came as late as the 94th minute. N’Zogbia with his second of the game, cutting in and somehow slipping it under Rob Green’s body to relegate West Ham to the Championship. Avram Grant was relieved of his managerial duties before he even left the stadium.
Two contrasting games in which Grant managed a team who were in need. Neither time he managed to get the result he was after, although I’m not reading into that here. What this post is all about, is the highs and lows of football management and how quickly it can all turn around, for better or worse. Take Steve McLaren for example; from “wally with the brolly” to Dutch league champions, to a (very brief) unsuccessful stint in Germany with Wolfsburg. The fact is, with so much at stake in football these days, it’s a cut throat business where chairmen, directors and even fans demand results. If those results don’t come, you’re out of the door without a question asked. There’s no continuity, not enough time for a manager to actually build a squad and getting them to gel together. If the results don’t come immediately, it’s goodbye, and you’re only ever as good as your last job, your last result.
Anyway, back to Grant. With three clubs in three years, he has reached a League Cup Final, an FA Cup Final, a Champions League Final (losing all three) and relegated two of the three teams, although to be fair to the Isreali, Portsmouth did have a 9 point deduction, not helping his chances whatsoever. Nice man that he seems, I can’t see him having too much trouble getting his next job, although not necessarily a top one. As for West Ham, a big club that I always wanted to survive. I hope they bounce straight back next season. Manager wise, if you want someone to come in and get the best out of your team, Martin O’Neill’s your man. Would he be interested in a Championship job though, only the man himself can answer that.
For now though, I look forward to seeing you at The Ricoh Arena next season.
Location: Luzhniki Stadium Moscow
Time: 23:35 (local time)
Event: UEFA Champions League Final
What’s at stake: An illusive Champions League title and, evidently, Grant’s job
Situation: Possibly Avram Grant’s most important half time team talk to date
Having already lost in the League Cup Final, the pressure was on Avram Grant to deliver some sort of silverware to the Chelsea hierarchy. This was his last chance, the final game of the season, the one trophy that Russian owner Roman Abramovic wanted most, the Champions League. Grant had the chance to turn himself from zero to hero in the space of a single match.
It’s coming up to half time, you’re team have been outplayed for most of the first half, 1-0 down, barely still in the game thanks to some outstanding saves from your Czech goalkeeper. You’re planning your inspirational team talk, what can you say to the team to lift them for the second half? Then, Frank Lampard equalises, suddenly everything’s changed. You’re back on level terms before the break, what to say now?
Whatever he said worked, to a degree at least. Chelsea were resurgent in the second period, pinning Man Utd back and taking the game to them. The only thing they couldn’t do was score. Extra time came and went. The lottery of a penalty shootout. Chelsea lost, and Grant was sent packing.
Fast forward three years…
Date: Sunday 15 May 2011
Location: DW Stadium Wigan
Time: 16:50
Event: Wigan V West Ham 6 pointer at the bottom of the Premiership
What’s at stake: Survival/relegation and possibly Avram Grant’s job
Situation: Another half time team talk. Maybe not as important as the Champions League Final, but try telling that to Hammers fans
Sitting bottom of the Premier League, Avram Grant’s West Ham are 6 points from safety, 3 points away from their opponents on the day Wigan. Win, and they see another week of Premiership action. Draw or Lose, and they are relegated from the Premiership.
A great first half from Grant’s side, as a brace from Demba Ba see’s them take a 2-0 lead into the break. 45 minutes of football left to play, and all West Ham need to do is stay in the lead. Grant again takes his players into the dressing room for the all important team talk. Keep going? Sit back and absorb pressure, maybe make a defensive substitution to shore up at the back?
His words didn’t have the same effect as they did back in 2008. 12 minutes into the second half Charles N’Zogbia had got one back for Wigan, who were level just over 10 minutes later. With West Ham struggling under pressure, the killer blow came as late as the 94th minute. N’Zogbia with his second of the game, cutting in and somehow slipping it under Rob Green’s body to relegate West Ham to the Championship. Avram Grant was relieved of his managerial duties before he even left the stadium.
Two contrasting games in which Grant managed a team who were in need. Neither time he managed to get the result he was after, although I’m not reading into that here. What this post is all about, is the highs and lows of football management and how quickly it can all turn around, for better or worse. Take Steve McLaren for example; from “wally with the brolly” to Dutch league champions, to a (very brief) unsuccessful stint in Germany with Wolfsburg. The fact is, with so much at stake in football these days, it’s a cut throat business where chairmen, directors and even fans demand results. If those results don’t come, you’re out of the door without a question asked. There’s no continuity, not enough time for a manager to actually build a squad and getting them to gel together. If the results don’t come immediately, it’s goodbye, and you’re only ever as good as your last job, your last result.
Anyway, back to Grant. With three clubs in three years, he has reached a League Cup Final, an FA Cup Final, a Champions League Final (losing all three) and relegated two of the three teams, although to be fair to the Isreali, Portsmouth did have a 9 point deduction, not helping his chances whatsoever. Nice man that he seems, I can’t see him having too much trouble getting his next job, although not necessarily a top one. As for West Ham, a big club that I always wanted to survive. I hope they bounce straight back next season. Manager wise, if you want someone to come in and get the best out of your team, Martin O’Neill’s your man. Would he be interested in a Championship job though, only the man himself can answer that.
For now though, I look forward to seeing you at The Ricoh Arena next season.
17 May 2011
I'll See Your 4-2-3-1, And I'll Raise You...
I read a great piece on a blog recently about the 4-2-3-1 formation. The article received several comments on how to counter the formation. I was planning on commenting but then ran away with the typing somewhat, so decided to put my thoughts here. The original piece can be found here.
I think you have to be careful when talking about countering an opponents formation. All to often you can be too committed to stopping the opposition playing rather than actually playing yourself. You have to give them as many questions about how to deal with you as they have about how to deal with them. However, I know that wasn't the point of the original post, nor the comments, so here is how I would counter the 4-2-3-1...
First of all, the wide men. You need to research and know what they do when they receive the ball. Are they going to charge down the touchline, heading for the byline to whip in a cross, or are they going to cut inside and run across the defence, aiming to get a shot off. If it's the former, then standard full backs are needed, and they must be told to stick to position. A flat back four is key. They also shouldn't push forward to match the wingers deep position. Maintain your position and wait for them to come to you. Pushing up and pressuring them straight away will result in a good winger easing past you with yards of space and time to pick out the cross. If it's the latter (inside forwards) then you want to be tucking your fullbacks in, almost as if you're playing with four centre backs. Not only does this show the opposition down the outside and onto their weaker foot (inside forwards tend to play on the opposite wing to their favoured foot) but also ensures that when they do cut in, they will be running into traffic, minimising the space with which to work with.
Next up the attacking midfielder. Again it would help to know exactly what sort of role he is playing to help yourself counter against his talents. The most obvious way to deal with him would be to man mark him. Put a defensive midfielder on him with the sole responsibility to stop him from playing. You would effectively lose this player completely in an attacking sense, but if the AMC really is that good, it is a worthwhile sacrifice. You could also play a high defensive line. Moving your defence closer to your midfield restricts the space he has to work with and he can become suffocated very easily. This could be suicidal though, as you are leaving a lot of space behind your back line for a potentially pacy striker to exploit.
A bit further up the field, you don't really want to be matching their DM's one for one. I would play a central 3 in front of their 2, again waiting for them to come to you rather than pushing forward. The majority of the time the DM's will be receiving the ball from the back line, so there's no real need to jump on top of them, depending on the match situation of course. The outer 2 can also track wide if needs be, as the wingers drop deep to collect the ball. Up top I would go with a pair of strikers, with one buzzing around the other in an almost "false nine" role.
Played right, you could dominate the game with your central 3, keeping possession and frustrating the opposition. I'd also be quite confident in dealing with their attacking threat.
Of course though, all of this becomes irrelevant if they have far superior players to yours. It wouldn't work playing this against Liverpool if you were Coventry City.
On a final note, I think it's far more important in modern football to look at each individual player and their respective roles rather than their positions on a pitch. If you know the personal traits of your opposition, it's going to be far easier to deal with them.
Just my thoughts...
I think you have to be careful when talking about countering an opponents formation. All to often you can be too committed to stopping the opposition playing rather than actually playing yourself. You have to give them as many questions about how to deal with you as they have about how to deal with them. However, I know that wasn't the point of the original post, nor the comments, so here is how I would counter the 4-2-3-1...
First of all, the wide men. You need to research and know what they do when they receive the ball. Are they going to charge down the touchline, heading for the byline to whip in a cross, or are they going to cut inside and run across the defence, aiming to get a shot off. If it's the former, then standard full backs are needed, and they must be told to stick to position. A flat back four is key. They also shouldn't push forward to match the wingers deep position. Maintain your position and wait for them to come to you. Pushing up and pressuring them straight away will result in a good winger easing past you with yards of space and time to pick out the cross. If it's the latter (inside forwards) then you want to be tucking your fullbacks in, almost as if you're playing with four centre backs. Not only does this show the opposition down the outside and onto their weaker foot (inside forwards tend to play on the opposite wing to their favoured foot) but also ensures that when they do cut in, they will be running into traffic, minimising the space with which to work with.
Next up the attacking midfielder. Again it would help to know exactly what sort of role he is playing to help yourself counter against his talents. The most obvious way to deal with him would be to man mark him. Put a defensive midfielder on him with the sole responsibility to stop him from playing. You would effectively lose this player completely in an attacking sense, but if the AMC really is that good, it is a worthwhile sacrifice. You could also play a high defensive line. Moving your defence closer to your midfield restricts the space he has to work with and he can become suffocated very easily. This could be suicidal though, as you are leaving a lot of space behind your back line for a potentially pacy striker to exploit.
A bit further up the field, you don't really want to be matching their DM's one for one. I would play a central 3 in front of their 2, again waiting for them to come to you rather than pushing forward. The majority of the time the DM's will be receiving the ball from the back line, so there's no real need to jump on top of them, depending on the match situation of course. The outer 2 can also track wide if needs be, as the wingers drop deep to collect the ball. Up top I would go with a pair of strikers, with one buzzing around the other in an almost "false nine" role.
Played right, you could dominate the game with your central 3, keeping possession and frustrating the opposition. I'd also be quite confident in dealing with their attacking threat.
Of course though, all of this becomes irrelevant if they have far superior players to yours. It wouldn't work playing this against Liverpool if you were Coventry City.
On a final note, I think it's far more important in modern football to look at each individual player and their respective roles rather than their positions on a pitch. If you know the personal traits of your opposition, it's going to be far easier to deal with them.
Just my thoughts...
16 May 2011
I'ts Been A While
Nearly 6 months to be exact. But now that my other blog has come to the end of it’s shelf life, I have some new found free time to come back here and give my thoughts on what is going on around the world in the game of football. I have also set up a Twitter account (@Pricep87), not least to post updates and links to this blog and to try and promote it as much as I can.
To any new readers of this page, the words you see will mainly be of my own opinions rather than reports, and forgive me for not sitting on the fence as all of this is typed up around my 50 hour working week. After all, football is nothing without debate, so please feel free to leave your own opinions and comments. For anyone returning, as you can see I’ve give it a bit of a clean up, removing all old posts on gaming to turn it into a football only blog.
I’m not a professional writer, I’m just a 24 year old lad from Coventry with a lot on my mind. I do hope you enjoy reading
To any new readers of this page, the words you see will mainly be of my own opinions rather than reports, and forgive me for not sitting on the fence as all of this is typed up around my 50 hour working week. After all, football is nothing without debate, so please feel free to leave your own opinions and comments. For anyone returning, as you can see I’ve give it a bit of a clean up, removing all old posts on gaming to turn it into a football only blog.
I’m not a professional writer, I’m just a 24 year old lad from Coventry with a lot on my mind. I do hope you enjoy reading
30 Nov 2010
2nd December is D-Day
So in three days time, we will know the hosts for the 2018 and 2022 World Cups. This is the first time that FIFA have decided to announce two consecutive hosts at the same time, and is also the earliest that they have ever assigned the tournament. One of the reasons for this is to give the eventual winners as much time as possible to get ready for the finals. Get the stadiums up to scratch, hotels built and transport sorted. What they don’t want is another situation like they had with South Africa this year, and the one they are facing with Brazil in four years time. One would be excused for suggesting however, that the reason for the double announcement is just a ploy for FIFA to maximise it’s revenues, through one avenue or another.
It was rumoured that the decision date was going to be put back, whilst the FIFA ethics committee investigated claims of bribery and corruption inside footballs governing body regarding the votes. Various members were involved in the claims, with 2 voters and four other FIFA officials all receiving bans, not only for voting, but for working in football in general. All will still go ahead however, on Thursday 2nd December, with 22 voters instead of the original 24.
So where will the two tournaments go then. The process of voting has never quite been a transparent one, with the unexpected often becoming the expected. It would take a brave man to place his own money on predicting where each tournament will take place.
The 2018 tournament then is coming to Europe, with bids from England, Portugal/Spain, Holland/Belgium and Russia. South America’s CONMEBOL federation have already said that they will be giving their votes to Portugal/Spain, giving them a 3 vote head start on the rest with 19 left to count. In my opinion Russia should not get the tournament. Not only do they have logistical issues with it being such a large country, but the attitude of the countries fans is of a particular distaste for other nationalities crossing their border. I know of a fair few incidents when England played them during Euro 2008 qualifying. Recently, black player Peter Odemwingie left Russian side Locomotive for English side West Bromich Albion. Upon leaving the Locomotive fans displayed a banner thanking West Brom for taking Odemwingie off them, with a banana in the middle. A clear display of racism which has no place in football. They have however, never hosted the World Cup, which may end up working in their favour.
I don’t believe Holland and Belgium should get the tournament either, as they hardly put on the best of showings for Euro 2000, or it could be argued of course that that was largely down to England hooliganism. This then leaves Portugal and Spain's joint bid up against the one from England. Both of these have great cases to host a large scale international tournament in my opinion, with the suitable stadiums already in place and efficient transport already running. Maybe because we haven’t had the tournament since 1966 (Spain hosted World Cup 1982) or maybe because I am completely biased, but me personally would like to see the tournament in England.
As for 2022, that is over 11 years away, giving just about anyone enough time to build whatever is needed. I think that USA should take the honors here, as they put on arguably one of the best tournaments in history in 1994, although they face competition from Australia, Japan, Qatar and South Korea. One thing that does bug me though, Mohamed Bin Hammam has recently performed a u-turn and stated that he will now not be running for FIFA presidency next year, when Sepp Blatter stands for re-election. Another four years in office in return for Qatar 2022? Surely not?
It was rumoured that the decision date was going to be put back, whilst the FIFA ethics committee investigated claims of bribery and corruption inside footballs governing body regarding the votes. Various members were involved in the claims, with 2 voters and four other FIFA officials all receiving bans, not only for voting, but for working in football in general. All will still go ahead however, on Thursday 2nd December, with 22 voters instead of the original 24.
So where will the two tournaments go then. The process of voting has never quite been a transparent one, with the unexpected often becoming the expected. It would take a brave man to place his own money on predicting where each tournament will take place.
The 2018 tournament then is coming to Europe, with bids from England, Portugal/Spain, Holland/Belgium and Russia. South America’s CONMEBOL federation have already said that they will be giving their votes to Portugal/Spain, giving them a 3 vote head start on the rest with 19 left to count. In my opinion Russia should not get the tournament. Not only do they have logistical issues with it being such a large country, but the attitude of the countries fans is of a particular distaste for other nationalities crossing their border. I know of a fair few incidents when England played them during Euro 2008 qualifying. Recently, black player Peter Odemwingie left Russian side Locomotive for English side West Bromich Albion. Upon leaving the Locomotive fans displayed a banner thanking West Brom for taking Odemwingie off them, with a banana in the middle. A clear display of racism which has no place in football. They have however, never hosted the World Cup, which may end up working in their favour.
I don’t believe Holland and Belgium should get the tournament either, as they hardly put on the best of showings for Euro 2000, or it could be argued of course that that was largely down to England hooliganism. This then leaves Portugal and Spain's joint bid up against the one from England. Both of these have great cases to host a large scale international tournament in my opinion, with the suitable stadiums already in place and efficient transport already running. Maybe because we haven’t had the tournament since 1966 (Spain hosted World Cup 1982) or maybe because I am completely biased, but me personally would like to see the tournament in England.
As for 2022, that is over 11 years away, giving just about anyone enough time to build whatever is needed. I think that USA should take the honors here, as they put on arguably one of the best tournaments in history in 1994, although they face competition from Australia, Japan, Qatar and South Korea. One thing that does bug me though, Mohamed Bin Hammam has recently performed a u-turn and stated that he will now not be running for FIFA presidency next year, when Sepp Blatter stands for re-election. Another four years in office in return for Qatar 2022? Surely not?
3 Nov 2010
The End of the Draw?
Quick question to start things off, what did this years World Cup give you? What memories will you take from it, that will last for many years? Awful refereeing decisions? Big goalkeeping mistakes? Dirty tactics in the Final?
One thing is for sure, it won’t be the wonderful football that was on display because, quite frankly, there was none. A 25 man Technical Study Group came out with a 288 page book report that suggested “nearly all teams now play with a compact defence.” Well congratulations, I could have told you that for free, let alone the absurd amounts that these 25 members most likely earn. The fact of the matter is, is that in International - and some club - football now, the main objective in a match is to not concede. Now I’m not saying this is a bad philosophy, far from it, what I am worried about however is the number of teams who also don’t look to score either. The sort of teams that almost know they are beaten before they enter the field of play, and do all they can to shut the opposition out, with no sense of attacking play whatsoever producing un-entertaining games ending in draws. This cannot be good for the future of the game.
So what does world footballs fearless leader plan to do about all this negativity. “We are considering doing away with draws in the first round (of World Cups) and also ending extra-time play. If there is no winner at the end of 90 minutes of play, we could proceed directly to penalty kicks.” I forget the writer now, but I once read a column in World Soccer magazine that said “Sepp Blatter comes up with 50 new ideas a day, 51 of them are bad.” A fairly accurate description if you ask me. Other possibilities that the world football governing body has mentioned include increasing the size of the goals and reducing both teams players by one every few minutes during extra time.
There is definitely reason for something to change, because this years World Cup really wasn’t that entertaining to watch, likewise with the 2006 tournament, although I did spend a lot of time travelling to and from Germany for the England games, so maybe didn’t catch enough of that tournament. The ideas being proposed however, are not something that I would like to see. If we do away with draws and go straight to penalty shootouts, then these teams who know they will struggle to get anything from a game, will go even more defensive. The fact that a penalty shootout is an absolute lottery will mean teams playing for that outcome all the more. We shall see what they eventually come up with, but if the past is anything to go by, more than likely nothing and we shall continue as we are.
As ever, sources and quotes taken from World Soccer magazine.
One thing is for sure, it won’t be the wonderful football that was on display because, quite frankly, there was none. A 25 man Technical Study Group came out with a 288 page book report that suggested “nearly all teams now play with a compact defence.” Well congratulations, I could have told you that for free, let alone the absurd amounts that these 25 members most likely earn. The fact of the matter is, is that in International - and some club - football now, the main objective in a match is to not concede. Now I’m not saying this is a bad philosophy, far from it, what I am worried about however is the number of teams who also don’t look to score either. The sort of teams that almost know they are beaten before they enter the field of play, and do all they can to shut the opposition out, with no sense of attacking play whatsoever producing un-entertaining games ending in draws. This cannot be good for the future of the game.
So what does world footballs fearless leader plan to do about all this negativity. “We are considering doing away with draws in the first round (of World Cups) and also ending extra-time play. If there is no winner at the end of 90 minutes of play, we could proceed directly to penalty kicks.” I forget the writer now, but I once read a column in World Soccer magazine that said “Sepp Blatter comes up with 50 new ideas a day, 51 of them are bad.” A fairly accurate description if you ask me. Other possibilities that the world football governing body has mentioned include increasing the size of the goals and reducing both teams players by one every few minutes during extra time.
There is definitely reason for something to change, because this years World Cup really wasn’t that entertaining to watch, likewise with the 2006 tournament, although I did spend a lot of time travelling to and from Germany for the England games, so maybe didn’t catch enough of that tournament. The ideas being proposed however, are not something that I would like to see. If we do away with draws and go straight to penalty shootouts, then these teams who know they will struggle to get anything from a game, will go even more defensive. The fact that a penalty shootout is an absolute lottery will mean teams playing for that outcome all the more. We shall see what they eventually come up with, but if the past is anything to go by, more than likely nothing and we shall continue as we are.
As ever, sources and quotes taken from World Soccer magazine.
20 Oct 2010
Welcome Back Bellamy
Now there’s not many football players about that I really dislike, but I did take great pleasure in Craig Bellamy’s poor performance last night on his return to Coventry after leaving the club some nine years ago.
Despite only scoring 6 goals during his one season with us, I have no doubt about the ability of the Welsh front man. A top player I know that he is, and I was shocked when I seen him come down to the Championship. A man of his quality would have had no shortage of clubs from the Premiership willing to take him.
Ability apart though, the guy is nothing short of a trouble maker. He seems to fall out with the staff and players at pretty much any club that he has been at, including the ridiculous golf club incident with John Arne Riise at Liverpool. The reason for my dislike though, is because of his criticism of Coventry City Football Club, and the City itself when he left for Newcastle all those years ago.
I have to admit though, despite not doing anything all night, I was worried that he would pop up with the winning goal, to silence the boo boys in the Ricoh Arena. Cardiff manager Dave Jones said in a post match interview that the fans were scared of Bellamy. He was probably right, but he was far from the truth when he said that was the reason for the jeers.
As for the match, a penalty given in the fourth minute is an incident I would like to see again. From where I was sitting (half way up the stand behind the goal where it happened) it didn’t look like a penalty. Sure, Turner seemed to have hold of him, but if you’re going to start giving penalties for that, then you will be giving them all day long. Harsh I thought. In the end though, it was another former Coventry man that got the winning goal. Jay Bothroyd, another player that most of Coventry fans hate and abuse.
Our performances this season, I think, are beginning to get better. A win away at Ipswich and a narrow loss - albeit still a loss - against a good Cardiff side just 2 points off the top of the league are two not bad results. Last night we were fighting for the ball in midfield, going in for fifty-fifty balls whereas before we were bottling it. The one thing we are still missing though I feel, is a creative midfielder, someone that is going to make things happen, because with Marlon King in the side now, I think we have the goals in us.
Despite only scoring 6 goals during his one season with us, I have no doubt about the ability of the Welsh front man. A top player I know that he is, and I was shocked when I seen him come down to the Championship. A man of his quality would have had no shortage of clubs from the Premiership willing to take him.
Ability apart though, the guy is nothing short of a trouble maker. He seems to fall out with the staff and players at pretty much any club that he has been at, including the ridiculous golf club incident with John Arne Riise at Liverpool. The reason for my dislike though, is because of his criticism of Coventry City Football Club, and the City itself when he left for Newcastle all those years ago.
I have to admit though, despite not doing anything all night, I was worried that he would pop up with the winning goal, to silence the boo boys in the Ricoh Arena. Cardiff manager Dave Jones said in a post match interview that the fans were scared of Bellamy. He was probably right, but he was far from the truth when he said that was the reason for the jeers.
As for the match, a penalty given in the fourth minute is an incident I would like to see again. From where I was sitting (half way up the stand behind the goal where it happened) it didn’t look like a penalty. Sure, Turner seemed to have hold of him, but if you’re going to start giving penalties for that, then you will be giving them all day long. Harsh I thought. In the end though, it was another former Coventry man that got the winning goal. Jay Bothroyd, another player that most of Coventry fans hate and abuse.
Our performances this season, I think, are beginning to get better. A win away at Ipswich and a narrow loss - albeit still a loss - against a good Cardiff side just 2 points off the top of the league are two not bad results. Last night we were fighting for the ball in midfield, going in for fifty-fifty balls whereas before we were bottling it. The one thing we are still missing though I feel, is a creative midfielder, someone that is going to make things happen, because with Marlon King in the side now, I think we have the goals in us.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)